Political Communication in times of New Political Culture
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
The process of globalisation and its clear communicative, cultural and political effects are greatly affecting two relatively new concepts in academic research, specifically Political Communication and Political Culture. The relationship between these concepts is increasingly interdependent as the tools and languages of Political Communication strongly influence the formation of the New Political Culture, and in turn, citizen activity through digital communication tools is conditioning the generation of content and the creation of discourse which take shape in the form of Political Communication.
We believe that to understand the reasons for this relationship it is necessary to establish, firstly, the characteristics of the New Political Culture, and secondly, the way in which the possibilities offered by technology transform the generation and transmission of Political Communication. Possibly the newest aspect of this relationship is that it has a two-way nature, altering the classic roles of the communication process that clearly distinguishes transmitters and receivers. This new aspect constitutes global evidence and is felt in a very similar way in all western representative democracies.
This work endeavours to describe and analyse this emerging scenario which has taken shape as another of the transformations which are occurring in advanced societies, and to identify some trends which, in all cases, are subject to the accelerated change of our time.
Keywords: Political Culture, Disaffection, Participation, Political Communication, Digital Technologies, Communicative Languages.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Ainsworth, S., Hardy, C., y Harley, B. (2005). Online consultation: e-democracy and e-resistance in the case of the development gateway. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 120-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905276562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905276562
Allcott, H., y Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of economic perspectives, 31(2), 211-36. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
Almond, G. A., y Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. London: Sage Publications.
Amoedo, A., Vara, A., y Negredo, S. (2018). DigitalNewsReport.es 2018. Navarra: Universidad de Navarra.
Bauman, Z. (2007). Vida de consumo. México, D.F.: Fondo de cultura económica.
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., y Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
Bastos, M. T., y Mercea, D. (2017). The Brexit botnet and user-generated hyperpartisan news. Social Science Computer Review, 37(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317734157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317734157
Bell, D. (1994). El advenimiento de la Sociedad post-industrial. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Blumler, J. G., y Kavanagh, D. (2000). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political communication, 16(3), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596
Boczkowski, P. J., y Anderson, C. W. (2017). Remaking the news: Essays on the future of journalism scholarship in the digital age. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10648.001.0001
Bullen, Margaret. (2017). La antropología feminista: Aportaciones conceptuales para una epistemología participativa. En J. Martinez (Ed.) Participar desde los feminismos: Ausencias, expulsiones y resistencias (pp. 29-63). Barcelona: Icaria.
Calderón, C. (2011). ¿Qué es el gobierno abierto? Revista Evoca, (4), 5-9.
Casero-Ripollés, A., y Yeste, E. (2014). La comunicación política hoy: entre nuevos medios y viejas lógicas. Trípodos. Facultat de Comunicació i Relacions Internacionals Blanquerna, (34).
Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Castells, M. (2017). Ruptura. La crisis de la democracia liberal. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Chaves-Montero, A. (Ed). (2017). Comunicación Política y Redes Sociales. Sevilla: Egregius Ediciones.
Clark, N., y Inglehart, R. (1998). The New Political Culture: Changing Dynamics of Support for the Welfare State and other Policies in Postindustrial Societies. En, T. Clark y V. Hoffman-Martinot, (eds), The new political culture (pp. 9-72). Boulder: Westview Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429496158-2
Del Olmo, J. (2018). La política por otros medios. Madrid: La Catarata.
Del Rey Morató, J. (2008). Comunicación política, Internet y campañas electorales: de la teledemocracia a la ciberdemocracia. Madrid: Tecnos.
Eilders, C. (2000). Media as political actors? Issue focusing and selective emphasis in the German quality press.
German Politics, 9(3), 181-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000008404613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000008404613
Ganuza, E., y Font, J. (2018). ¿Por qué la gente odia la política?: Cómo nos gustaría que se tomaran las decisiones políticas. Madrid: La Catarata.
Gil Calvo, E. (2018). Comunicación política. Madrid: La Catarata.
Guess, A., Nyhan, B., y Reifler, J. (2018). Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign. European Research Council, 9. Recuperado de http://www.ask-force.org/web/Fundamentalists/Guess-Selective-Exposure-to-Misinformation-Evidence-Presidential-Campaign-2018.pdf
Gutiérrez Conde, J. (2018). Atrapados por el futuro. Madrid: Pirámide.
Hermes, J. (2006). Citizenship in the Age of the Internet. European Journal of Communication, 21(3), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323106066634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323106066634
Innerarity, D. (2017). Política para perplejos. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg.
Jorge, J. E., y Miró, E. M. (2011). Medios de comunicación, democracia y cultura política. Question, 1. Recuperado de http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/34423
Jurado, F. (2015). Nueva gramática Política: de la revolución en las comunicaciones al cambio de paradigma. Barcelona: Icaria.
Kampen, J. K., y Snijkers, K. (2003). E-democracy: A critical evaluation of the ultimate e-dream. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 491-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303256095
Lash, S., y Urry, J. (1998). Economía de signos y espacios: sobre el capitalismo de la posorganización. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Lassalle, J. M. (2017). Contra el populismo. Cartografía de un populismo postmoderno. Barcelona: Editorial Debate.
Lechner, N. (1990). Los patios interiores de la democracia: subjetividad y política. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Lechner, N. (1996). ¿Por qué la política ya no es lo que fue? Leviatán: Revista de hechos e ideas, (63), 63-74.
Lewis, S. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, 15(6), 836-866. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.674150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.674150
Macnamara, J., Sakinofsky, P., y Beattie, J. (2012). E-electoral engagement: How governments use social media to engage voters. Australian Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 623-639. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2012.731491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2012.731491
Mair, P. (2013). Gobernando el vacío. La banalización de la democracia occidental. Madrid.: Alianza Editorial.
Morozov, E. (2017). El impacto del activismo digital en la política de la Post Guerra Fria en La Era de la Perplejidad. Repensar el Mundo que conocíamos. Madrid: BBVA. Recuperado de https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/articulos/el-impacto-del-activismo-digital-en-la-politica-de-la-post-guerra-fria/
Mounk, Y. (2018). El pueblo contra la democracia. Barcelona: Paidós.
Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A Prívate Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity.
Politikon. (2017). El muro Invisible. Barcelona: Editorial Debate.
Prior, M. (2007). Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878425
Polarizes Election. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rheingold, H. (2004). Multitudes inteligentes: La próxima revolución social. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Simón, P. (2018). El príncipe moderno. Democracia, política y poder. Barcelona: Editorial Debate.
Simone, R. (2016). El Hada Democrática. Por qué la Democracia Fracasa. Madrid: Taurus.
Subirats, J. (2010). Si la respuesta es gobernanza, ¿cuál es la pregunta? Factores de cambio en la política y en las políticas. EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, 74(02), 16-35. Recuperado de https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/artpub/2010/108181/ekonomiaz_a2010n74p16.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.69810/ekz.1011
Sunstein, C. (2017). Republic. Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884711
Tajel, H. (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Touraine, A. (1971). La Sociedad Post-Industrial. Barcelona: Ariel.
Turiera-Puigbò, T. (2009). Què està canviant l'ús d'internet en la manera de fer i comunicar l'acció política?.
Quaderns del CAC, (33), 13-19.
Túñez, M., y Sixto, J. (2011). Redes sociales, política y Compromiso 2.0: La comunicación de los diputados españoles en Facebook. Revista Latina de comunicación social, (66), 210-234. Recuperado de http://www.revistalatinacs.org/11/art/930_Santiago/09_Tunez.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-66-2011-930-216-246
Ureña, D. (2011). Decálogo para un candidato 2.0. Cuadernos de comunicación evoca, 4(29-33).
Warner, B. R., McGowen, S. T., y Hawthorne, J. (2012). Limbaugh's social media nightmare: Facebook and Twitter as spaces for political action. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 19(2), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2012.722479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2012.722479